Cairngorms, Speyside Deer Management Group

Part 2 - The Issues

7.1 Achieving deer densities that support cultural, social, economic and environmental objectives
The main issue arising in the area relates to the reconciliation of the unacceptable grazing impact on the natural heritage in some designated sites, and the requirement of sporting estates to provide accessible numbers of red deer stags to achieve their sporting objectives. Roe deer, sheep, hares and rabbits are also important but the wide-ranging behaviour of red deer especially requires a co-operative approach by neighbours over large areas (Tables 1 and 2). The approach taken here is to define the problem areas and to then consider whether red deer numbers can be reduced without jeopardising the sporting requirements of estates. The areas of concern have been defined by SNH through their Site Management Statements (7.1.1 ) and through the DCS ‘Priority Sites’ procedures (7.1.2 and see 4.3).
 
7.1.1 Site Management Statements
SNH have now produced a site management statement for all SSSIs and established a national system of site condition monitoring (SCM) on a 6-yearly cycle. SCM enables the condition of the special features of the site to be assessed over the long term in order to highlight where a change in management may be required. This monitoring will be important in assessing the impacts of deer and other grazing animals and it is important that landowners are involved in the process. Tables 1 and 2 present summarised information extracted from SNH Management Statements for SSSIs to indicate the locations of specific issues with regard to deer in the two proposed sub areas (see Section 9.2). All SSSI site management statements are due to be reviewed over the next five years as a requirement under the Nature Conservation Act.
 
Table 1 Summary of condition and requirements on SSSIs in western sub-area
SSSI Issue Cause Year of SCM assessment Proposed solution
Drumochter Hills Overgrazing, trampling and burning Sheep, deer, hares 2003-05 Monitoring – possible reduction in grazing. Baseline survey in 2006/07
Cairngorms Overgrazing – impact on natural tree-line Red deer 2002
2004
Input to DMP – reduced grazing impacts
Loch Etteridge (Phones) None deer-related   N/A  
River Spey – Insh Marshes Grazing management Mainly domestic stock 2001-02 Monitoring. Grazing management
River Feshie None specifically deer-related   2002-03  
Northern Corries Woodland and montane scrub regeneration Red deer and reindeer 2001
2002
Management of deer densities. Monitoring
North Rothiemurchus Overgrazing in some areas Red and roe deer 2002 Input to DMP Monitoring
Alvie Overgrazing Sheep, deer, rabbits, hares 2001 Grazing management
 
SCM data reflects conditions at the time of measurement and at least three years has elapsed since the most recent of these. Changes may have occurred during the period since assessment and these changes will be reflected in subsequent monitoring. The Site Management Statements for all three of the Cairngorms, Northern Corries and North Rothiemurchus Pinewoods all contain a common recommendation: “Work with DMGs, DCS and owners to encourage the regeneration of woodland and montane scrub by management of deer populations within an agreed DMP”
 
Northern Corries
For the Northern Corries SSSI, the SMS includes the following “ Grazing is principally by red deer and at present is allowing natural regeneration of pine and other species. The CSDMG is currently producing an updated plan for deer management across this area and this should encourage continued woodland regeneration and the development of montane scrub ”.

North Rothiemurchus
For the North Rothiemurchus Pinewoods SSSI, the SMS states “Grazing by red and roe deer is currently the most influential factor in the management of the native pinewoods and management of the deer population within the site and in the surrounding areas is a key issue influencing habitat condition. Existing grazing levels are allowing tree regeneration to occur in some areas”.

Cairngorms
For the Cairngorms SSSI, the SMS states “Past and present levels of grazing, largely by red deer, have had a major impact on habitats in the site. Evidence of this can be seen in the lack of natural regeneration in many areas of the Caledonian pinewoods, the absence of a “natural “ tree line, the lack of a shrub layer in the forest and the paucity of broad-leaved trees throughout the existing woodlands. The removal of vegetation through over grazing and trampling has also affected heathland, wetland and plateau communities, where the soil has become exposed and erosion is occurring and the extent of some communities (eg montane scrub) has been reduced. Large concentrations of deer can result in trampling of dotterel eggs and chicks thus affecting their breeding success and, deer dung can cause enrichment of high altitude habitats. There is also a potential for erosion to occur where numbers of deer are high. However, concerted efforts are now being made to manage deer impacts in large parts of the site around Invereshie/ Inshriach, Upper Glenavon, Glenfeshie, Rothiemurchus and in the Mar Lodge woods where native woodland restoration by natural regeneration is a management priority. Deer Management Groups now play an active role in the co-ordination and integration of the management of deer across the site.

In summary, the condition of native pinewoods was assessed as not being in good condition at these three sites at the time of assessment. However, the real and potential impacts of red deer continue to be addressed and SNH currently see no reason to review management. Updated data on the condition of vegetation will be available from subsequent SCM assessments.

 
Table 2 Summary of condition and requirements on SSSIs in eastern sub-area
SSSI Issue Cause Year of SCM assessment Proposed solution
Ladder Hills Overgrazing and burning
Not serious
Mainly sheep, deer 1999
2004
Monitoring
Inchrory Overgrazing Rabbits, red deer, mountain hare 2003 Control of rabbits and deer.
Management of grazing impacts.
Monitoring.
Eastern Cairngorms Overgrazing on tree regeneration (Mar Lodge) Red deer 2002 SNH Management agreement with
Mar Lodge
Greag nan Gamhainn Management of grazing (rabbits and cattle) No problem 2002 Monitoring
Abernethy Overgrazing on montane habitats and broadleaved trees Red and roe deer 2003 Deer management Input to DMP
Glenmore None deer-related   2000  
Inchrory
Management of the Inchrory SSSI raises some difficult issues relating to the regulation of rabbit and red deer grazing to permit woodland regeneration while at the same time maintaining the open grazed habitats.
The SMS includes the following; “Continue to encourage the control of rabbit populations, to allow the flowering and fruiting of characteristic herbs and to encourage tall herbs, scrub and woodland and juniper scrub to regenerate and develop naturally in appropriate areas” and, “Continue to encourage the control of deer populations, within targets set by the Cairngorms Speyside DMG for each estate, to allow the flowering and fruiting of characteristic herbs and to encourage tall herbs, scrub and woodland and juniper scrub to regenerate and develop naturally in appropriate areas”. Glenavaon Estate has demonstrated a strong commitment to rabbit control and this continues to be a significant on going management commitment. Red deer densities are also at a relatively low level.

The management challenge is highlighted in the following statement from the SMS (2003); “The site has been and continues to be subject to a high grazing pressure from a combination of rabbits, red deer and mountain hare, although the contribution to grazing impacts in different parts of the site from each species is unclear. Many of the habitat interests have apparently benefited from the recent reductions in rabbit grazing but heavy impacts in the form of scuffing and poaching are still evident in some areas, including sensitive habitats such as tufa springs, calcareous flushes and associated grassland. This has locally led to an abundance of meadow thistle, ragwort and other weeds. In the future if the levels of grazing in the open ground habitats continues to fall and the cover of dwarf shrubs, shrubs and tree species increases, the species composition of some of these habitats is likely to be affected significantly. If grazing falls to levels which will allow woodland regeneration and expansion, careful management of stocking levels may be necessary to maintain open ground habitats through preferential grazing…”

Ladder Hills
For the Ladder Hills SSSI, the SMS (2004) states that “Red and Roe deer are seen although there is no hefted red deer on the hill and their contribution to the grazing is limited”, and “A survey in 1999 concluded that whilst grazing pressure from sheep (and deer) is sometimes high, in general it does not seem to be having a deleterious affect on sub-alpine, alpine and snowbed heaths. The effects on dry heath have yet to be systematically assessed.”

Eastern Cairngorms
For the Eastern Cairngorms SSSI, the SMS (2002) states, “High deer numbers have until recently prevented tree regeneration and necessitated the erection of deer fences. The management agreement with the National Trust for Scotland is aimed at reducing the red deer population to a level that encourages regeneration without fences”.

 
7.1.2 Priority Sites: the Feshie Catchment Section 7 Agreement

Within the CSDMG area, the Feshie Catchment is the only current DCS Priority Site and an associated Agreement under section 7 of the Deer (Scotland) Act 1996 is in place. This Agreement covers Glenfeshie, Inshriach, Invereshie, Killiehuntly and part of Mar Lodge. The Agreement was established in 2000 and is due to expire in 2010.

Glenfeshie estate was encouraged by Forestry Commission Scotland (FCS) and DCS to enter into this agreement in order to prevent damage to the natural heritage at Glenfeshie. The Agreement underpins the Glenfeshie Estate Deer Management Plan (May 2000) and the Glenfeshie Woodland Grant Scheme (WGS). A key aim of the Estate Deer Management Plan and the Glenfeshie WGS is to regenerate and expand the Caledonian pinewood present at Glenfeshie.

In the initial 3 years of the Agreement (2000 – 2003), success was measured against the achievement of target deer culls and target deer populations. It is intended that success over the remaining period of the Agreement should be determined by habitat response. DCS is using the performance of existing tree seedlings as a proxy indicator of the overall condition of the Natura woodland interests present at the site. DCS carried out Tree Seedling Surveys in 2003, 2004 and 2005. SNH and Glenfeshie estate are also monitoring the performance of tree seedlings.

The habitat target agreed within the section 7 is “ the positive average growth of sufficient seedlings and trees currently below browse height”. There was no overall positive change in the height of seedlings surveyed by DCS in 2004 and 2005.

Glenfeshie estate is pursuing multiple objectives that demand economic, ecological and social sustainability. The presentation of sporting stags to paying clients provides a significant part of the financial income to support the employment of staff. However, the main wintering area for red deer, the main glen, is the key area for the regeneration of the native woodland and is the focus of a Natura 2000 designation and a Forestry Commission Woodland Grant Scheme. Although habitat targets have been introduced, deer numbers remain to be considered a threat by DCS and deer numbers continue to be reduced. As a consequence the initial sporting requirement for Glenfeshie estate was reduced from 80-120 to 60-80, and is now fixed at 60. Further reductions of red deer on Glenfeshie and on other estates within the Agreement may affect the numbers of red deer on adjacent range and this is taken account of in this DMP (Section 11).

Estimates of red deer occupancy in the main glen (by Glenfeshie Estate) indicate a reduction from 34 deer km-2 in 2000, 19 deer km-2 in 2002, 12 deer km-2 in 2003 and 8.6 deer km-2 2004. However, in 2005, in spite of a continuing reduction in many parts of the main glen, the average occupancy had risen to 11.6 deer km-2. Occupancy/density generally remains too high to guarantee tree regeneration although some seedlings are beginning to emerge from the surrounding vegetation in some places

 
7.2 Defining overgrazing relative to land use objectives
Appropriate densities of deer depend on local land use objectives. For example, native woodland regeneration may require average densities (occupancy) of 4-8 deer km-2, while heather moorland will be sustained at about 6-15 deer km-2 and fertile grasslands at in excess of 15 deer km-2. Each of these densities is appropriate to the specific land uses described. Overgrazing is defined here as a level of grazing impact that inhibits or prevents the achievement of objectives.

Because high tree densities, growth rates and tree form are relatively less important in naturally regenerated native woodlands than in areas of planted seedlings with commercial objectives, native woodlands can withstand higher levels of grazing/browsing. The pursuit of commercial forestry objectives, which require the virtual elimination of deer, should be avoided in all but exceptional circumstances.

 
7.3 Achieving habitat changes
If changes in land use objectives that require changes in deer numbers or densities are planned, methods for adjusting deer densities and appropriate timescales for these require discussion and agreement between members of the DMG. The availability of public support and lead public agencies should be clarified.
 
7.4 Avoidance of adverse impacts on neighbours interests
Where the maintenance of deer densities to achieve local objectives impacts on neighbour’s interests, discussion at a local and CSDMG level is required. Opportunities for co-operative culling operations should be discussed and might include seeking agreement on the following;
local numbers and density targets
public access routes and recommendations
the need and location for fences
areas for tree planting
areas for habitat restoration
areas for access and culling by neighbours
use of diversionary tactics eg scaring deer from sensitive areas
provision of sanctuary areas to retain deer and to provide viewing
selective culling objectives and tactics
In the western sub-area there is a clear need for collaboration between estates in order to achieve agreed cull targets (see Part 4 of this DMP).
 
7.5 Deer population monitoring
The use of direct counts by helicopter and ground based teams and by dung counts in appropriate habitats are important tools for ascertaining deer density/occupancy data. These will continue to be a requirement for the basis of population models.
 
7.6 Stag: hind ratios
Potential conflicts between acceptable densities of red deer to meet sporting and ecological requirements can sometimes be reconciled by modifying sex ratios. For example, it may be possible to achieve a sufficiently robust stag population with relatively fewer hinds.
 
7.7 Lack of mature stags
A lack of sufficient stags greater than six years of age may jeopardise the cultural/socio-economic objectives (ie presenting trophy quality stags). Reasons for a lack of mature stags need to be investigated.
 
7.8 Public understanding of deer
There is a perceived lack of public knowledge and understanding about the role of deer in land management and conservation and their contribution to local economies. An educational policy and information programme would help to raise awareness.
 
7.9 Ability of people to view wild deer
There is a perception that tourist wish to see wild animals, including deer. Careful culling and the establishment of sanctuary areas, where deer can remain unmolested at all times of the year, will help.
 
7.10 The contribution of deer to local economies
This topic is poorly understood and there is a lack of quantitative information. The CSDMG
Currently monitors total and sporting culls. Statistics on direct employment in deer management are available (but not consistently documented and reviewed by the CSDMG); however, the total contribution of deer and deer related activities to local economies (eg Hotel accommodation, restaurants, hill walking, purchasing from local shops) is unknown. It is very important that such information is available and a commissioned study would be valuable. The CSDMG will approach the CNPA with regard to obtaining funding for such a study

Website: Ardchattan Solutions Ltd