| 7.1 Achieving deer densities that support
cultural, social, economic and environmental objectives |
| The main issue arising in the area relates
to the reconciliation of the unacceptable grazing impact on
the natural heritage in some designated sites, and the requirement
of sporting estates to provide accessible numbers of red deer
stags to achieve their sporting objectives. Roe deer, sheep,
hares and rabbits are also important but the wide-ranging behaviour
of red deer especially requires a co-operative approach by neighbours
over large areas (Tables
1 and 2). The
approach taken here is to define the problem areas and to then
consider whether red deer numbers can be reduced without jeopardising
the sporting requirements of estates. The areas of concern have
been defined by SNH through their Site Management Statements
(7.1.1 ) and through the
DCS ‘Priority Sites’ procedures (7.1.2
and see 4.3). |
| |
| 7.1.1 Site Management
Statements |
| SNH have now produced a site management statement
for all SSSIs and established a national system of site condition
monitoring (SCM) on a 6-yearly cycle. SCM enables the condition
of the special features of the site to be assessed over the
long term in order to highlight where a change in management
may be required. This monitoring will be important in assessing
the impacts of deer and other grazing animals and it is important
that landowners are involved in the process. Tables 1 and 2
present summarised information extracted from SNH Management
Statements for SSSIs to indicate the locations of specific issues
with regard to deer in the two proposed sub areas (see
Section 9.2). All SSSI site management statements are due
to be reviewed over the next five years as a requirement under
the Nature Conservation Act. |
| |
| Table 1 Summary
of condition and requirements on SSSIs in western sub-area |
| SSSI |
Issue |
Cause |
Year of SCM assessment
|
Proposed solution |
| Drumochter Hills |
Overgrazing, trampling
and burning |
Sheep, deer, hares |
2003-05 |
Monitoring – possible
reduction in grazing. Baseline survey in 2006/07 |
| Cairngorms |
Overgrazing – impact
on natural tree-line |
Red deer |
2002
2004
|
Input to DMP – reduced
grazing impacts |
| Loch Etteridge (Phones) |
None deer-related |
|
N/A |
|
| River Spey – Insh
Marshes |
Grazing management |
Mainly domestic stock |
2001-02 |
Monitoring. Grazing management |
| River Feshie |
None specifically deer-related |
|
2002-03 |
|
| Northern Corries |
Woodland and montane scrub
regeneration |
Red deer and reindeer |
2001
2002
|
Management of deer densities.
Monitoring |
| North Rothiemurchus |
Overgrazing in some areas
|
Red and roe deer |
2002 |
Input to DMP Monitoring |
| Alvie |
Overgrazing |
Sheep, deer, rabbits,
hares |
2001 |
Grazing management |
|
| |
| SCM data reflects conditions at the time
of measurement and at least three years has elapsed since the
most recent of these. Changes may have occurred during the period
since assessment and these changes will be reflected in subsequent
monitoring. The Site Management Statements for all three of
the Cairngorms, Northern Corries and North Rothiemurchus Pinewoods
all contain a common recommendation: “Work with DMGs,
DCS and owners to encourage the regeneration of woodland and
montane scrub by management of deer populations within an agreed
DMP” |
| |
Northern
Corries
For the Northern Corries SSSI, the SMS includes the following
“ Grazing is principally by red deer and at present is
allowing natural regeneration of pine and other species. The
CSDMG is currently producing an updated plan for deer management
across this area and this should encourage continued woodland
regeneration and the development of montane scrub ”.
North Rothiemurchus
For the North Rothiemurchus Pinewoods SSSI, the SMS states
“Grazing by red and roe deer is currently the most influential
factor in the management of the native pinewoods and management
of the deer population within the site and in the surrounding
areas is a key issue influencing habitat condition. Existing
grazing levels are allowing tree regeneration to occur in
some areas”.
Cairngorms
For the Cairngorms SSSI, the SMS states “Past and present
levels of grazing, largely by red deer, have had a major impact
on habitats in the site. Evidence of this can be seen in the
lack of natural regeneration in many areas of the Caledonian
pinewoods, the absence of a “natural “ tree line,
the lack of a shrub layer in the forest and the paucity of
broad-leaved trees throughout the existing woodlands. The
removal of vegetation through over grazing and trampling has
also affected heathland, wetland and plateau communities,
where the soil has become exposed and erosion is occurring
and the extent of some communities (eg montane scrub) has
been reduced. Large concentrations of deer can result in trampling
of dotterel eggs and chicks thus affecting their breeding
success and, deer dung can cause enrichment of high altitude
habitats. There is also a potential for erosion to occur where
numbers of deer are high. However, concerted efforts are now
being made to manage deer impacts in large parts of the site
around Invereshie/ Inshriach, Upper Glenavon, Glenfeshie,
Rothiemurchus and in the Mar Lodge woods where native woodland
restoration by natural regeneration is a management priority.
Deer Management Groups now play an active role in the co-ordination
and integration of the management of deer across the site.
In summary, the condition of native pinewoods was assessed
as not being in good condition at these three sites at the
time of assessment. However, the real and potential impacts
of red deer continue to be addressed and SNH currently see
no reason to review management. Updated data on the condition
of vegetation will be available from subsequent SCM assessments.
|
| |
| Table 2 Summary
of condition and requirements on SSSIs in eastern sub-area |
| SSSI |
Issue |
Cause |
Year of SCM assessment
|
Proposed solution |
| Ladder Hills |
Overgrazing and burning
Not serious
|
Mainly sheep, deer |
1999
2004
|
Monitoring |
| Inchrory |
Overgrazing |
Rabbits, red deer, mountain
hare |
2003 |
Control of rabbits and
deer.
Management of grazing impacts.
Monitoring. |
| Eastern Cairngorms |
Overgrazing on tree regeneration
(Mar Lodge) |
Red deer |
2002 |
SNH Management agreement
with
Mar Lodge |
| Greag nan Gamhainn |
Management of grazing
(rabbits and cattle) |
No problem |
2002 |
Monitoring |
| Abernethy |
Overgrazing on montane
habitats and broadleaved trees |
Red and roe deer |
2003 |
Deer management Input
to DMP |
| Glenmore |
None deer-related |
|
2000 |
|
|
Inchrory
Management of the Inchrory SSSI raises some difficult issues
relating to the regulation of rabbit and red deer grazing to
permit woodland regeneration while at the same time maintaining
the open grazed habitats.
The SMS includes the following; “Continue to encourage
the control of rabbit populations, to allow the flowering and
fruiting of characteristic herbs and to encourage tall herbs,
scrub and woodland and juniper scrub to regenerate and develop
naturally in appropriate areas” and, “Continue to
encourage the control of deer populations, within targets set
by the Cairngorms Speyside DMG for each estate, to allow the
flowering and fruiting of characteristic herbs and to encourage
tall herbs, scrub and woodland and juniper scrub to regenerate
and develop naturally in appropriate areas”. Glenavaon
Estate has demonstrated a strong commitment to rabbit control
and this continues to be a significant on going management commitment.
Red deer densities are also at a relatively low level. The
management challenge is highlighted in the following statement
from the SMS (2003); “The site has been and continues
to be subject to a high grazing pressure from a combination
of rabbits, red deer and mountain hare, although the contribution
to grazing impacts in different parts of the site from each
species is unclear. Many of the habitat interests have apparently
benefited from the recent reductions in rabbit grazing but
heavy impacts in the form of scuffing and poaching are still
evident in some areas, including sensitive habitats such as
tufa springs, calcareous flushes and associated grassland.
This has locally led to an abundance of meadow thistle, ragwort
and other weeds. In the future if the levels of grazing in
the open ground habitats continues to fall and the cover of
dwarf shrubs, shrubs and tree species increases, the species
composition of some of these habitats is likely to be affected
significantly. If grazing falls to levels which will allow
woodland regeneration and expansion, careful management of
stocking levels may be necessary to maintain open ground habitats
through preferential grazing…”
Ladder Hills
For the Ladder Hills SSSI, the SMS (2004) states that “Red
and Roe deer are seen although there is no hefted red deer
on the hill and their contribution to the grazing is limited”,
and “A survey in 1999 concluded that whilst grazing
pressure from sheep (and deer) is sometimes high, in general
it does not seem to be having a deleterious affect on sub-alpine,
alpine and snowbed heaths. The effects on dry heath have yet
to be systematically assessed.”
Eastern Cairngorms
For the Eastern Cairngorms SSSI, the SMS (2002) states, “High
deer numbers have until recently prevented tree regeneration
and necessitated the erection of deer fences. The management
agreement with the National Trust for Scotland is aimed at
reducing the red deer population to a level that encourages
regeneration without fences”.
|
| |
| 7.1.2 Priority Sites:
the Feshie Catchment Section 7 Agreement |
| Within the CSDMG area, the Feshie Catchment
is the only current DCS Priority Site and an associated Agreement
under section 7 of the Deer (Scotland) Act 1996 is in place.
This Agreement covers Glenfeshie, Inshriach, Invereshie, Killiehuntly
and part of Mar Lodge. The Agreement was established in 2000
and is due to expire in 2010.
Glenfeshie estate was encouraged by Forestry Commission Scotland
(FCS) and DCS to enter into this agreement in order to prevent
damage to the natural heritage at Glenfeshie. The Agreement
underpins the Glenfeshie Estate Deer Management Plan (May
2000) and the Glenfeshie Woodland Grant Scheme (WGS). A key
aim of the Estate Deer Management Plan and the Glenfeshie
WGS is to regenerate and expand the Caledonian pinewood present
at Glenfeshie.
In the initial 3 years of the Agreement (2000 – 2003),
success was measured against the achievement of target deer
culls and target deer populations. It is intended that success
over the remaining period of the Agreement should be determined
by habitat response. DCS is using the performance of existing
tree seedlings as a proxy indicator of the overall condition
of the Natura woodland interests present at the site. DCS
carried out Tree Seedling Surveys in 2003, 2004 and 2005.
SNH and Glenfeshie estate are also monitoring the performance
of tree seedlings.
The habitat target agreed within the section 7 is “
the positive average growth of sufficient seedlings and trees
currently below browse height”. There was no overall
positive change in the height of seedlings surveyed by DCS
in 2004 and 2005.
Glenfeshie estate is pursuing multiple objectives that demand
economic, ecological and social sustainability. The presentation
of sporting stags to paying clients provides a significant
part of the financial income to support the employment of
staff. However, the main wintering area for red deer, the
main glen, is the key area for the regeneration of the native
woodland and is the focus of a Natura 2000 designation and
a Forestry Commission Woodland Grant Scheme. Although habitat
targets have been introduced, deer numbers remain to be considered
a threat by DCS and deer numbers continue to be reduced. As
a consequence the initial sporting requirement for Glenfeshie
estate was reduced from 80-120 to 60-80, and is now fixed
at 60. Further reductions of red deer on Glenfeshie and on
other estates within the Agreement may affect the numbers
of red deer on adjacent range and this is taken account of
in this DMP (Section
11).
Estimates of red deer occupancy in the main glen (by Glenfeshie
Estate) indicate a reduction from 34 deer km-2 in 2000, 19
deer km-2 in 2002, 12 deer km-2 in 2003 and 8.6 deer km-2
2004. However, in 2005, in spite of a continuing reduction
in many parts of the main glen, the average occupancy had
risen to 11.6 deer km-2. Occupancy/density generally remains
too high to guarantee tree regeneration although some seedlings
are beginning to emerge from the surrounding vegetation in
some places
|
| |
| 7.2 Defining overgrazing relative to
land use objectives |
| Appropriate densities of deer depend on local
land use objectives. For example, native woodland regeneration
may require average densities (occupancy) of 4-8 deer km-2,
while heather moorland will be sustained at about 6-15 deer
km-2 and fertile grasslands at in excess of 15 deer km-2. Each
of these densities is appropriate to the specific land uses
described. Overgrazing is defined here as a level of grazing
impact that inhibits or prevents the achievement of objectives.
Because high tree densities, growth rates and tree form are
relatively less important in naturally regenerated native
woodlands than in areas of planted seedlings with commercial
objectives, native woodlands can withstand higher levels of
grazing/browsing. The pursuit of commercial forestry objectives,
which require the virtual elimination of deer, should be avoided
in all but exceptional circumstances.
|
| |
| 7.3 Achieving habitat changes |
| If changes in land use objectives that require
changes in deer numbers or densities are planned, methods for
adjusting deer densities and appropriate timescales for these
require discussion and agreement between members of the DMG.
The availability of public support and lead public agencies
should be clarified. |
| |
| 7.4 Avoidance of adverse impacts on neighbours
interests |
| Where the maintenance of deer densities to
achieve local objectives impacts on neighbour’s interests,
discussion at a local and CSDMG level is required. Opportunities
for co-operative culling operations should be discussed and
might include seeking agreement on the following; |
| • |
local numbers and density targets |
| • |
public access routes and recommendations |
| • |
the need and location for fences |
| • |
areas for tree planting |
| • |
areas for habitat restoration |
| • |
areas for access and culling by neighbours |
| • |
use of diversionary tactics eg scaring deer from sensitive
areas |
| • |
provision of sanctuary areas to retain deer and to provide
viewing |
| • |
selective culling objectives and tactics |
|
| In the western sub-area there is a clear
need for collaboration between estates in order to achieve agreed
cull targets (see
Part 4 of this DMP). |
| |
| 7.5 Deer population monitoring |
| The use of direct counts by helicopter and
ground based teams and by dung counts in appropriate habitats
are important tools for ascertaining deer density/occupancy
data. These will continue to be a requirement for the basis
of population models. |
| |
| 7.6 Stag: hind ratios |
| Potential conflicts between acceptable densities
of red deer to meet sporting and ecological requirements can
sometimes be reconciled by modifying sex ratios. For example,
it may be possible to achieve a sufficiently robust stag population
with relatively fewer hinds. |
| |
| 7.7 Lack of mature stags |
| A lack of sufficient stags greater than six
years of age may jeopardise the cultural/socio-economic objectives
(ie presenting trophy quality stags). Reasons for a lack of
mature stags need to be investigated. |
| |
| 7.8 Public understanding of deer |
| There is a perceived lack of public knowledge
and understanding about the role of deer in land management
and conservation and their contribution to local economies.
An educational policy and information programme would help to
raise awareness. |
| |
| 7.9 Ability of people to view wild deer |
| There is a perception that tourist wish to
see wild animals, including deer. Careful culling and the establishment
of sanctuary areas, where deer can remain unmolested at all
times of the year, will help. |
| |
| 7.10 The contribution of deer to local
economies |
This topic is poorly understood and there
is a lack of quantitative information. The CSDMG
Currently monitors total and sporting culls. Statistics on direct
employment in deer management are available (but not consistently
documented and reviewed by the CSDMG); however, the total contribution
of deer and deer related activities to local economies (eg Hotel
accommodation, restaurants, hill walking, purchasing from local
shops) is unknown. It is very important that such information
is available and a commissioned study would be valuable. The
CSDMG will approach the CNPA with regard to obtaining funding
for such a study
|